TAL.co

Menu
Get Started
Fixing-the-Disconnect-Between-HR-and-Hiring-Managers

Fixing the Disconnect Between HR and Hiring Managers

If you’ve ever heard conversations among HR professionals and hiring managers, you’ll sometimes catch a hint of frustration. HR teams say they can’t get clear feedback or timely updates; hiring managers say it takes too long to bring in the right candidates. Sound familiar? This disconnect isn’t just an inconvenience; it can seriously undermine a company’s ability to attract, hire, and retain top talent. The good news is that there are concrete ways to bridge this gap and create a more united, effective hiring process.

Below, we’ll explore what causes the disconnect between HR and hiring managers, why it matters, and how both sides can collaborate more effectively to reach the goal everyone presumably shares: bringing on the best-fit employees in a timely manner. It might take some effort, but it’s absolutely doable once the issues are well understood and addressed.

Outline

Understanding the Communication Gap

Why the Disconnect Matters

What Causes the Disconnect?

Strategies to Close the Gap

Understanding the Communication Gap

Communication is at the heart of a functioning recruiting process. When HR and hiring managers are on the same page, job descriptions get crafted more precisely, candidate profiles are properly vetted, and new hires come onboard faster. But when lines of communication fail, it can create a serious ripple effect:

Vague or Contradictory Job Descriptions

HR might be told to post a job listing for a “marketing manager,” but the hiring manager actually needs someone focused on analytics and campaign optimization. If that isn’t spelled out clearly, the recruiter could be sourcing great generalist candidates who don’t fit the specialized role the hiring manager needs.

Conflicting Expectations

Perhaps HR has set a hiring timeline of six weeks, while the hiring manager expects to fill the role in four. By the time either side realizes the mismatch in timelines, the process is already stalled.

Delayed Feedback Loops

Recruiting often thrives on quick turnarounds—promptly reviewing résumés, scheduling interviews, and getting back to candidates. But if a hiring manager is slow to respond due to other priorities, HR is left with candidates waiting and possibly losing interest.

Why the Disconnect Matters

A breakdown in collaboration between HR and hiring managers leads to a host of problems that go well beyond annoyance or inconvenience:

Losing Out on Great Candidates

Top-tier candidates typically move quickly in the job market. If they have multiple offers—or a straightforward, transparent recruitment process at another company—they’re unlikely to wait for your team to get its act together. Slow responses or lack of clarity can push skilled professionals toward competitors.

Damaging Employer Branding

Employer branding isn’t just about fancy logos and social media presence. A crucial aspect revolves around the candidate’s impression of how your organization treats employees and job seekers. When internal inefficiencies stall progress or cause inconsistent communication, word can spread. Negative reviews—through personal networks or public sites—can discourage future applicants from taking your openings seriously.

Wasting Resources

Hiring is an investment. Every additional day spent in the recruitment process can be a drain on staff time and money. Constant misalignment might force you to redo tasks—for instance, rewriting the job description or launching another search if initial candidates are unsuitable. Over time, these avoidable inefficiencies can add up financially.

What Causes the Disconnect?

No single factor is solely responsible. Instead, there are multiple drivers that can create a wedge between HR and hiring managers:

Different Areas of Expertise

HR professionals are adept at compliance, recruitment best practices, and systems management. Hiring managers live in the thick of daily tasks and know the exact skill gaps in their teams. When these perspectives don’t mesh well, it can lead to tension.

Competing Priorities

Many hiring managers juggle large workloads that might not center on recruiting. They might feel they don’t have time to review résumés promptly or hold multiple interview rounds. On the other hand, HR wants to keep the recruitment pipeline moving, mindful of time-to-fill metrics and best practices.

Unclear Roles and Responsibilities

If it’s not made explicit who handles tasks like scheduling interviews, giving candidate feedback, or drafting offer letters, confusion creeps in.

Lack of Feedback Loops

Sometimes, HR isn’t aware of the hiring manager’s honest perspective on a candidate, or a hiring manager doesn’t receive timely updates on how the search is progressing. This communication void builds frustration and fosters disconnect.

Strategies to Close the Gap

Align Early With a Thorough Intake Meeting

Bringing everyone into a single conversation right at the outset can prevent a ton of misunderstanding later. HR should sit down with the hiring manager to address specifics:

  • What are the “must-have” skills and traits for the role?
  • What would the hiring manager consider an ideal candidate, and what compromises can be made if that perfect combination isn’t out there?
  • What is the realistic timeline for recruiting, interviewing, and hiring?
  • Are there any budget constraints that might hamper the process?

This sort of thorough intake meeting helps everyone know what the expectations are upfront. In addition to daily communication, don’t underestimate the power of a well-structured “kickoff” meeting.

Nail Down the Job Description

If you’re serious about attracting the right candidates, you’ll need a clear and detailed job description. This isn’t just about listing tasks and qualifications; it’s about painting a vivid, accurate picture of the role.

HR can contribute perspective on market norms and compliance-friendly language, while the hiring manager will highlight the day-to-day responsibilities that a candidate should expect. A perfect blend of both creates a job description that resonates with the right audience.

Set a Formal Communication Cadence

Sometimes, people genuinely want to collaborate but are consumed by their workloads. That’s why a structured schedule for check-ins is indispensable. These can be 15-minute weekly or biweekly calls where the HR partner updates the hiring manager on new candidates, interviews completed, and any potential hurdles.

The hiring manager can then quickly offer feedback or raise issues. By scheduling these meetings, neither side has to scramble or wonder when they’ll next discuss the open position.

Define Key Metrics and Goals

“Time-to-fill” is a common metric, but it’s not the only one that matters. Other gauges like candidate satisfaction, quality of hire, and retention rate also help you track success. When HR and hiring managers agree upfront on what success looks like, there’s less room for confusion about whether the process is “going well.”

If the metric is mostly about finding someone fast, the approach might differ from a process focused on finding an exact skill match—even if it takes a bit longer.

Be Realistic About Timelines and Resources

Very few roles can be filled overnight. Knowing how complex the search could be and communicating that early can minimize frustration. If the talent pool for a specialized position is small, let the hiring manager know that it might take a couple of months to find the right person.

At the same time, HR should be ready to adapt: If hiring managers need someone up to speed fast, perhaps there’s a way to shorten parts of the process, such as combining interview rounds. Balancing these needs takes open dialogue and flexibility.

Provide Mutual Feedback Respectfully

Feedback isn’t just about telling HR that a candidate isn’t suitable, or telling the hiring manager they aren’t giving enough input. It also involves explaining why. Did the candidate lack essential tech skills? Were they strong in certain areas but missing in others? The more specific the feedback loop, the more efficient recruiting becomes. If a hiring manager wants to see more variety or more specialized candidates, that information is crucial to sourcing efforts.

Consider Leveraging Technology Tools

Automated applicant tracking systems (ATS), internal team communication platforms, and project management tools sometimes streamline the process. Tools that allow for real-time visibility into candidate status, interview notes, and next steps can be a life-saver. But remember that technology is only as good as the humans using it. The best software supports, rather than replaces, human collaboration.

Keep Your Eyes on the Shared Goal

At the end of the day, both HR and hiring managers want the same thing: a great new hire who brings value to the organization and fits into the workplace culture. It’s easy to lose sight of that when you’re mired in daily tasks and deadlines. Reminding each other about the shared objective can help smooth over minor friction and keep morale high.

Celebrate the Wins

It might sound trivial, but celebrating a successful hire or quicker-than-expected fill time keeps spirits up. When you acknowledge the collaborative effort that went into a good hire—especially in a tough labor market—it reinforces positive behaviors like timely communication and thorough preparation. That success story then becomes a blueprint for future searches.

Picture of Ryan Nead

Ryan Nead

Ryan has served in the Staffing and Recruiting industry for over 10 years. As an independent recruiter and business owner Ryan partners with decision-makers to attract, hire, and attain top-tier professionals to succeed and grow their companies. Ryan consistently implements new tools to help the needs of both clients and candidates until they are satisfied. With years of direct experience and knowledge from scaling and disrupting other major global industries. If you don't see Ryan with his family he is hard at work finding the right fit for your organization's open roles.

Latest posts by